top of page
Search

The Experience Machine

  • graysonpitcock
  • Jul 20
  • 2 min read

Updated: Aug 13


ree

Picture this:

There's a machine. You step into it, close your eyes, and wake up in a world that feels completely real. You don’t know that it's a simulation. You can live life the way you want. You can fall in love, win the Olympics, or become a famous artist or philosopher. Every experience feels vivid and meaningful, and you’ll feel proud of yourself and loved. You’ll feel like your life matters.

But it’s all fake, and none of it actually happens. You’re just floating in a tank while your brain is fed perfect experiences.

Would you plug in?

This was the question philosopher Robert Nozick posed in the 1970s. He called it the Experience Machine and used it to challenge the idea that happiness is all that matters. Because if happiness or pleasure is the ultimate goal, then this machine should be the ultimate life. You’d get the best possible version of existence, without any of the pain or failure that usually comes with it.

But most people say no. They wouldn’t plug in.

And that’s weird. If we care about feeling good, why reject the one thing that guarantees it?

Nozick thought this meant we care about more than just happiness. We want to live in contact with reality. We want to actually do things, not just believe we are doing them. It matters to us whether our relationships, achievements, and experiences are genuine. Even if we couldn’t tell the difference, something about the fake version feels hollow.

There’s something in us that wants truth, even if it hurts. We want our lives to mean something, and meaning might depend on real consequences, real risk, real struggle. If you "climb Everest" in the machine, did you really climb it? If you "fall in love," does it count if no one else exists?

You could say the machine strips life of its rough edges, but maybe those edges are the very things that make life meaningful in the first place.

Of course, there are people who might say yes. People who’ve been through trauma, or deep suffering, or who feel like the real world has nothing left to offer. For them, the machine might feel like relief. And that’s not something to dismiss. It’s a reminder that not everyone starts with the same relationship to reality. Not everyone is running from the same things.

But here’s where the thought experiment gets eerie. It isn’t really fiction anymore. We already live with pieces of the experience machine. Social media lets us curate perfect versions of ourselves. Virtual reality keeps getting better. Our lives are full of simulations that blur the line between what’s real and what just feels real. So maybe the better question now isn’t just would you plug in, but are you already halfway there?

The Experience Machine isn’t just about a machine. It’s about what kind of life we want. It asks whether joy is enough on its own, or if we need something deeper. It asks whether meaning comes from inside us, or from our relationship to something outside us. Something real.

So think about it. Would you plug in?

And if not, what does that say about who you are?

 
 
 

1 Comment


Jackson Pitcock
Jackson Pitcock
Jul 21

I really like this blog! It's awesome!

Like

About Me

My name is Grayson Pitcock. I founded Philosophy Check, a philosophy blog and student discussion club.

I am a Bergen Catholic High School student and have spent most of my life living in Tenafly, which occupies five square miles in the northern end of New Jersey. With a 41.7% minority population, my hometown is diverse. Neighbors on my street speak Korean, Hebrew, Spanish, Hindi, and Russian. 

My family is multicultural. One side of my family, from the Midwest, has deep American roots dating back to the Revolutionary War, and the other side, from the East Coast, is a second-generation immigrant family of Korean ancestry. Although many aspects of my family upbringing may sound familiar, my multicultural background has enabled me to experience contrasting ideas, beliefs, and perspectives representing the diverse opinions of this vast country. Building relationships across differences happens nearly daily, both within and outside my family. 

I am interested in understanding how people can disagree profoundly yet still share space, community, and even friendship. Living in this environment has made me deeply curious about how people arrive at their beliefs, how truth is constructed and contested, and what it means to live ethically in a pluralistic society. I found myself drawn to philosophy because I was fascinated by the frameworks we use to ask questions about justice, morality, freedom, and self.

In my free time, my background also leads me to look for ways to bring people together in community advocacy, to support youth mental health and environmental justice. This means showing up fully, learning as I go, and getting others with me. Whether between different groups at school or in conversations where people don’t agree, I enjoy challenging myself and those around me to question their assumptions and see all sides of our choices while bridging gaps across divides. 

I am a part of a Youth Advisory Board for NJ4S, a state-led initiative that advocates for youth mental wellness in New Jersey. The Youth Advisory Board is a group of health care professionals, community organizers, and students who meet in person or virtually every month. Of the many communities that I am involved in, this one is significant to me in that I can see in others sharing the same belief I hold in community advocacy, of gathering experiences and building networks between communities and policymakers that can address the health needs of local communities in northern New Jersey. 

bottom of page